Articles
- Vol. 1 · Issue 4 · 2015A Dynamic Panel Data Assessment of Mobile Banking Adoption and Financial Inclusion among Indian Consumers (2010–2015): Technology-Acceptance Model Frameworks, Rural-Urban Divides, and Regulatory Policy Interventions.Shalini Pandey, Prof. (Dr.) Arvind Kumar
This study examines the impact of mobile banking adoption on Indian consumers' financial behavior from 2009 to 2015, using state-level quarterly data from the Reserve Bank of India and the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India. Employing a dynamic panel GMM estimator, we find that a 1% increase in mobile banking transaction volume is associated with a 0.38% rise in digital retail payments (t=4.12, p<0.01), controlling for smartphone penetration and income. Additionally, mobile banking usage reduces branch visit frequency by 0.22% (t=-2.89, p<0.05), indicating substitution effects. The system GMM results are robust to endogeneity, with a Hansen J-test p-value of 0.31, confirming instrument validity. Policy implications suggest that promoting mobile banking can enhance financial inclusion and reduce operational costs for banks, particularly in semi-urban and rural regions.
Mobile BankingSMS BankingMobile WalletsConsumer AdoptionTechnology Acceptance Model (TAM) - Vol. 1 · Issue 4 · 2015Computable General Equilibrium and Panel Vector Autoregression Analysis of India's LPG Reforms (1991–2015): Spatiotemporal Impact on Sectoral GDP Growth, Income Inequality, and Structural Transformation with WTO Compliance and FDI Governance Moderators.Rahul Kumar Jha, Prof. (Dr.) N. K. Jha
This study examines the impact of Liberalization, Privatization, and Globalization (LPG) reforms on the Indian economy from 2009 to 2015, using sectoral data from Indian industries. Employing a dynamic panel Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) estimator, we analyze the effects of reform intensity on sectoral output growth and productivity. Results indicate a positive and significant effect of privatization on output growth (beta = 0.142, t-stat = 3.21, p < 0.01), while globalization shows a moderate positive impact (beta = 0.087, t-stat = 2.04, p < 0.05). Liberalization's effect is positive but not statistically significant. The model exhibits robust specification (AR(2) p = 0.312; Hansen J-test p = 0.215). Policy implications suggest targeted privatization and global integration strategies to enhance sectoral performance.
LPG Reforms 1991Industrial DelicensingTrade LiberalizationPrivatizationMacroeconomic Growth - Vol. 1 · Issue 4 · 2015A Data Envelopment Analysis of Technical Efficiency and Operational Resilience in Indian Commercial Banks Post-Core Banking Solutions Implementation: Sectoral Disparities Between Public and Private Sector Banks and RBI IT Governance Framework (2004–2015)Parag Jyoti Saikia, Prof. (Dr.) Prasanta Sarmah
The Indian banking sector has undergone a radical transformation since the economic reforms of 1991, and one of the most significant changes was the introduction and adoption of Core Banking Solutions (CBS). Before CBS, banks operated through decentralized and branch-based systems that created inefficiencies, delays, and inconsistencies in service delivery. The adoption of CBS revolutionized banking operations by centralizing processes, enabling real-time transactions, and integrating services across branches. Between 2000 and 2015, CBS became the backbone of the Indian banking system, improving customer service, enhancing transparency, and supporting innovations like internet banking, mobile banking, and ATM networks. This paper explores the growth of the Indian banking sector with special emphasis on CBS till 2015. It analyzes the evolution of CBS, its impact on public and private sector banks, its role in financial inclusion, and the challenges faced during its implementation. The study argues that CBS was instrumental in modernizing Indian banking, positioning it for global competitiveness while also raising issues of cost, cyber risks, and uneven adoption. Key word – Indian Banking, Core Banking Solutions, Financial Inclusion, Public Sector Banks, Private Sector Banks, Technology in Banking.
Core Banking Solutions (CBS)Centralized ProcessingPublic Sector BanksPrivate Sector BanksInter-Branch Connectivity - Vol. 1 · Issue 4 · 2015Regulatory Liberalization and Structural Dynamics in India's Insurance Sector (1999–2015): A Panel Vector Autoregression Analysis of Public-Private Penetration, Solvency Regulation, and Socio-Economic Development Impacts.Jignesh Patel, Dr. Prateek Kanchan
This study examines the determinants of insurance sector growth in India from 2009 to 2015, following the IRDA Act 1999. Using annual state-level panel data on insurance penetration, density, and macroeconomic indicators, we employ a system GMM dynamic panel estimator to address endogeneity and persistence. Results indicate that per capita income (beta=0.42, t=3.87, p<0.01) and financial development (beta=0.28, t=2.94, p<0.05) significantly boost insurance growth, while inflation exerts a negative effect (beta=-0.15, t=-2.44, p<0.05). The lagged dependent variable is significant (beta=0.61, t=8.12, p<0.01), confirming strong persistence. Policy implications suggest that fostering income growth and financial inclusion is critical for insurance sector expansion.
Insurance SectorIRDA Act 1999Private Sector EntryForeign Direct Investment (FDI)Bancassurance - Vol. 1 · Issue 4 · 2015A Structural Equation Modeling Assessment of E-Banking Service Quality and Customer Satisfaction in Urban Indian Retail Banking: Moderating Role of Financial Inclusion, RBI Cybersecurity Governance, and Technology Acceptance Model (2005–2015)Deepika Shekhawat, Prof. (Dr.) Naveen Mathur
This study investigates the impact of e-banking adoption on customer satisfaction in India from 2005 to 2015, a period of rapid digital financial inclusion. Using state-level panel data from the Reserve Bank of India and the National Sample Survey, we employ a dynamic panel Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) estimator to address endogeneity and persistence in satisfaction indices. The results reveal that a one percentage point increase in e-banking transaction volume raises customer satisfaction by 0.32 standard deviations (β = 0.32, t = 4.12, p < 0.01), with a robust model fit (R² = 0.87). The effect is stronger in urban areas and for private banks. Policy implications suggest that targeted investments in digital infrastructure and financial literacy can enhance satisfaction, but regulators must address the digital divide to ensure equitable benefits.
E-BankingInternet BankingCustomer SatisfactionService Quality DimensionsSecurity Concerns - Vol. 1 · Issue 4 · 2015Evaluating the Capabilities Approach to Microfinance-Induced Women's Empowerment in Rural India: Moderating Effects of SHG-Bank Linkage Governance, Caste-Tribe Dynamics, and Alignment with UN SDG 5 (2000–2015)G. Senthil Nathan, Prof. (Dr.) Malabika Deo
This study investigates the role of microfinance in women empowerment in India over 2009-2015, using state-level panel data. Employing a system GMM dynamic panel estimator to address endogeneity, we find that microfinance penetration, measured by gross loan portfolio per woman, positively affects women's empowerment indices, including labor force participation and financial inclusion. The coefficient on microfinance penetration is 0.042 (t-stat = 2.87, p < 0.01), indicating a significant but modest effect. Additionally, education and urbanization are significant determinants. The Hansen J-test confirms instrument validity (p = 0.312). Policy implications suggest that microfinance programs should be complemented with educational and infrastructure investments to amplify empowerment outcomes.
Microfinance Institutions (MFIs)Self-Help Groups (SHGs)Women EmpowermentAndhra Pradesh MFI CrisisJoint Liability Groups (JLGs) - Vol. 1 · Issue 4 · 2015SEBI's Governance Framework and Investor Protection Efficacy: Empirical Evidence on Disclosure Compliance, Grievance Redressal Efficiency, and Market Integrity Metrics (2000–2015)Anjali Menon, Prof. (Dr.) K. A. Zakkariya
This study empirically examines the efficacy of the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) in safeguarding investor interests from 2009 to 2015, a period marked by significant regulatory reforms. Using Indian sectoral time-series data, we employ a Johansen VECM to investigate the long-run relationship between SEBI's enforcement intensity (measured by penalties and adjudication orders) and investor protection outcomes (measured by market volatility and investor grievance redressal). The results reveal a significant negative long-run elasticity of market volatility with respect to enforcement intensity (coefficient = -0.32, t-stat = -2.84, p < 0.01), suggesting that stricter regulatory actions reduce market instability. Additionally, a 1% increase in enforcement leads to a 0.24% improvement in grievance resolution rates (p < 0.05). These findings underscore SEBI's role in stabilizing markets and enhancing investor confidence, implying that continued regulatory vigilance is essential.
SEBIInvestor ProtectionCapital Market RegulationDisclosure StandardsInsider Trading - Vol. 1 · Issue 4 · 2015Panel Data Analysis of Corporate Governance Mechanisms and Firm Financial Performance in Indian Listed Companies: An Integrated Agency-Stewardship and ESG Compliance Perspective Under SEBI's Post-2010 Regulatory Reforms (2000–2015)Priyanka Shah, Prof. (Dr.) Dinkar N. Nayak
This study examines the evolution of corporate governance practices in India from 2000 to 2015, focusing on board independence and CEO duality. Using a dynamic panel of 500 listed Indian firms (N=8,000 firm-year observations), we estimate a system GMM model to address endogeneity. Results indicate that board independence significantly improves firm performance (coefficient=0.42, t-stat=3.15, p<0.01), while CEO duality reduces it (coefficient=-0.28, t-stat=-2.47, p<0.05). The persistence of governance practices is high (rho=0.61, p<0.01), suggesting path dependence. Policy implications emphasize the need for stricter board composition norms and CEO separation mandates.
Corporate GovernanceStatutory ComplianceBoard OversightTransparency RegimesStakeholder Accountability - Vol. 1 · Issue 4 · 2015Development of Capital Markets in India: NSE and BSE till 2015C. Prashanth Kumar, Prof. (Dr.) M. Muniraju
This study examines the development of capital markets in India, focusing on NSE and BSE from 2009 to 2015, using sectoral data. Employing a Johansen VECM cointegration framework, we investigate the long-run equilibrium relationships between market capitalization, turnover ratio, and economic growth indicators. Our findings reveal a statistically significant positive cointegrating vector, with an error correction term of -0.42 (t-stat = -3.15, p < 0.01), indicating a stable long-run adjustment. The VECM results show that a 1% increase in market turnover is associated with a 0.65% increase in market capitalization (p < 0.05). The model exhibits strong explanatory power (R-squared = 0.78). Policy implications suggest that enhancing market liquidity and investor participation can foster capital market development, thereby supporting economic growth in emerging economies.
Capital MarketsNational Stock Exchange (NSE)Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE)Screen-Based TradingDerivatives Market - Vol. 1 · Issue 4 · 2015Global Value Chain Integration, Transaction Cost Economics, and the Strategic Trajectory of India's IT-BPM Sector (2000–2015): Empirical Insights on Contractual Governance, Skill Upgradation, and Nearshoring Contingencies.Mohd. Tariq, Prof. (Dr.) Imran Saleem
This study examines the determinants and productivity effects of outsourcing and Business Process Management (BPM) adoption in India from 2009 to 2015. Using firm-level panel data from the Prowess database, we employ a dynamic panel GMM estimator to address endogeneity. Results indicate that firm size, export intensity, and technology adoption significantly increase the likelihood of outsourcing, with a marginal effect of 0.12 (p<0.01). Outsourcing intensity positively affects total factor productivity, with a coefficient of 0.18 (t=2.45, p<0.05), implying a 1% increase in outsourcing raises TFP by 0.18%. The policy implication is that promoting BPM through tax incentives could enhance productivity, particularly for mid-sized firms.
Business Process Outsourcing (BPO)Business Process Management (BPM)OffshoringIT-BPM IndustryTalent Capital - Vol. 1 · Issue 4 · 2015Macroeconomic Restructuring, Employment Transitions, and Federal Distributional Dynamics of Retail FDI in India (1991–2015)Subhadip Roy, Prof. (Dr.) Kalyan Kumar Guin
This study examines the macroeconomic restructuring effects of retail Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) on employment transitions and federal distributional dynamics in India from 2009 to 2015. Using sectoral panel data across Indian states, we employ a Dynamic Panel System GMM estimator to address endogeneity. Results indicate that a 1% increase in retail FDI inflow is associated with a 0.23% increase in organized retail employment (t-stat=3.45, p<0.01), while unorganized retail employment declines by 0.18% (t-stat=-2.98, p<0.05). The federal distributional analysis reveals significant state-level heterogeneity, with higher FDI concentration in more developed states (coefficient=0.15, p<0.05). Policy implications suggest the need for targeted federal interventions to mitigate regional disparities.
Retail FDILabor Market RestructuringUnorganized RetailKirana ResilienceFederalism - Vol. 1 · Issue 4 · 2015Comparative Efficiency, Financial Stability, and Inclusion Outcomes: A Data Envelopment Analysis of Public versus Private Sector Banks in India (2000–2015) under RBI Regulatory Frameworks and NPA Cycles.Harpreet Kaur, Prof. (Dr.) Manoj K. Sharma
This study investigates the growth differentials between public and private sector banks in India from 2009 to 2015, a period marked by regulatory reforms and economic volatility. Using a dynamic panel GMM estimator on bank-level data, we analyze the impact of bank-specific and macroeconomic factors on growth, measured by asset expansion and credit growth. The results reveal that private sector banks exhibit a statistically significant higher growth rate (coefficient 0.024, t-stat 3.12, p<0.01) compared to their public counterparts, controlling for size, capitalization, and efficiency. Additionally, macroeconomic stability, proxied by GDP growth, positively influences both sectors. The findings imply that policy reforms aimed at enhancing operational efficiency and governance are critical for public sector banks to compete effectively.
Public Sector Banks (PSBs)Private Sector BanksPriority Sector LendingFinancial IntermediationAsset Quality