Articles
- Vol. 2 · Issue 3 · 2016BPO and Indian Economy (1991-2016): Offshoring Empirical Effects, Strategic Globalization Paradigms, Sectoral Service Dimensions, Socio-Economic Mobility Impacts, and Policy Governance.Subhadip Roy, Prof. (Dr.) Kalyan Kumar Guin
This study examines the macroeconomic role of Business Process Outsourcing (BPO) in the Indian economy from 2010 to 2016, focusing on its impact on GDP growth, employment, and services exports. Using annual sectoral data from Reserve Bank of India and National Sample Survey Office, we employ a Johansen Vector Error Correction Model (VECM) to capture long-run equilibria and short-run dynamics. Results indicate a significant positive long-run elasticity of BPO revenue on GDP (β=0.12, t-stat=3.45, p<0.01) and employment (β=0.08, t-stat=2.98, p<0.05), with an error correction term of -0.35 (t-stat=-2.87). The model's R-squared is 0.87, confirming robustness. Policy implications suggest that fostering BPO growth through digital infrastructure and skill development can enhance economic resilience.
BPOIndian EconomyIT-enabled ServicesOutsourcingEmployment - Vol. 2 · Issue 3 · 2016Tourism-Led Growth in India (1991-2016): Input-Output Empirical Frameworks, Strategic Development Paradigms, Sectoral Spillovers, Socio-Economic Multipliers, and Governance StructuresShalini Pandey, Prof. (Dr.) Arvind Kumar
This study examines the determinants of tourism and hospitality industry growth in India from 2010 to 2016, utilizing annual state-level panel data from the Ministry of Tourism and Reserve Bank of India. Employing a Fixed Effects model with Driscoll-Kraay standard errors, we investigate the impact of foreign tourist arrivals, domestic tourist arrivals, infrastructure expenditure, and hospitality sector credit on tourism revenue. Results indicate that foreign tourist arrivals (β=0.45, t=3.21, p<0.01) and infrastructure expenditure (β=0.28, t=2.87, p<0.05) significantly enhance growth, while domestic arrivals show a weaker effect (β=0.12, p>0.10). The model explains 84% of variance (R²=0.84). Policy implications emphasize targeted infrastructure investment and international marketing to sustain sectoral growth.
TourismHospitalityIndiaEconomic GrowthDomestic Tourism - Vol. 2 · Issue 3 · 2016Globalization and India's Textile & Apparel Industry (1991-2016): Trade Liberalization Empirical Effects, Value Chain Strategic Paradigms, Sectoral Competitiveness Dimensions, Socio-Economic Welfare Impacts, and Governance Reforms.Anjali Menon, Prof. (Dr.) K. A. Zakkariya
This study examines the impact of globalization on the Indian textile and apparel industry from 2010 to 2016, using annual firm-level data from the Prowess database. Employing a dynamic panel GMM estimator, we address endogeneity in trade liberalization measures. Results indicate that a one percentage point increase in export intensity raises firm productivity by 0.42% (t=3.12, p<0.01), while import competition reduces profitability by 0.18% (t=-2.45, p<0.05). The policy implication is that targeted export promotion and skill development are necessary to mitigate adverse effects of import competition.
GlobalizationIndian Textile IndustryApparelExportsEmployment - Vol. 2 · Issue 3 · 2016Panel-Data Empirical Evaluation of NABARD's Institutional Governance and Agricultural Finance Impact on Rural Development and Farmer Livelihoods in India (1990–2016)Mohd. Tariq, Prof. (Dr.) Imran Saleem
This study evaluates the role of NABARD in agricultural and rural development in India from 2010 to 2016. Using state-level panel data on NABARD refinance, credit flow, and rural infrastructure, we employ a fixed-effects model with robust standard errors. The results show that a 1% increase in NABARD refinance is associated with a 0.32% increase in agricultural GDP (t=3.21, p<0.01). Additionally, NABARD's infrastructure investment significantly reduces rural poverty (coefficient=-0.18, t=-2.54, p=0.02). The model explains 76% of the variation (R-squared=0.76). These findings underscore NABARD's pivotal role in fostering rural growth, suggesting that scaling up refinance and infrastructure funding can enhance agricultural productivity and poverty alleviation.
Corporate GovernanceSEBI LODR GuidelinesBoard IndependenceAudit CommitteesShareholder Rights - Vol. 2 · Issue 3 · 2016Event-Study Empirical Analysis of Merger & Acquisition complementarity Realization, Corporate Governance, and Sectoral Dynamics in the Indian Corporate Sector (2000–2016)Harpreet Kaur, Prof. (Dr.) Manoj K. Sharma
This study investigates the evolving determinants of mergers and acquisitions (M&A) activity in the Indian corporate sector from 2010 to 2016, a period marked by significant regulatory and macroeconomic shifts. Using a comprehensive firm-level panel dataset from Indian manufacturing and services sectors, we employ a dynamic panel GMM estimator to control for endogeneity and persistence in deal flows. Our findings reveal that cash flow, Tobin's Q, and industry concentration significantly influence M&A intensity, with coefficients of 0.42 (t=3.12, p<0.01), 0.28 (t=2.45, p<0.05), and 0.15 (t=2.01, p<0.05), respectively. Additionally, leverage exhibits a negative effect (-0.31, t=-2.78, p<0.01). The Hansen J-test confirms instrument validity (p=0.24). These results underscore the need for competition policy reforms to address increasing market concentration.
MergersAcquisitionsIndian Corporate SectorConsolidationGlobalization - Vol. 2 · Issue 3 · 2016Low-Cost Carrier Evolution in Indian Aviation (2003-2016): Market Structure Empirical Analysis, Competitive Strategic Paradigms, Regional Sectoral Dimensions, Socio-Economic Spillovers, and Regulatory Governance.Jignesh Patel, Dr. Prateek Kanchan
This paper examines the evolution of India's aviation industry, focusing on low-cost carriers (LCCs) from 2010 to 2016. Using annual firm-level data from Indian scheduled airlines and a dynamic panel GMM estimator, we analyze determinants of market share and profitability. Results indicate that LCC market share increases with fuel price volatility (β=0.42, t=2.87, p<0.01) and route expansion (β=0.28, t=2.21, p<0.05), while profitability is negatively impacted by airport infrastructure constraints (β=-0.35, t=-3.12, p<0.01). The model demonstrates robust fit (R²=0.87) and passes specification tests. Policy implications suggest that targeted infrastructure investment and fuel hedging mechanisms can enhance LCC viability and market contestability.
Indian AviationLow-Cost CarriersAirlinesAir TravelLiberalization - Vol. 2 · Issue 3 · 2016Green Banking Initiatives in Indian Commercial Banks (2010-2016): ESG Empirical Frameworks, Sustainable Finance Strategic Paradigms, Sectoral Financing Dimensions, Climate-Socio-Economic Impacts, and Governance Accountability.C. Prashanth Kumar, Prof. (Dr.) M. Muniraju
This study investigates the determinants and impacts of green banking initiatives by Indian commercial banks from 2010 to 2016, using sectoral data from the Reserve Bank of India and bank-level disclosures. Employing a system Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) dynamic panel model, we find that bank size and profitability significantly influence green lending intensity, with coefficients of 0.034 (t=2.87, p<0.01) and 0.021 (t=2.12, p<0.05), respectively. Conversely, non-performing assets negatively affect adoption (-0.029, t=-2.54, p<0.05). The model exhibits robust specification with a Hansen J-test p-value of 0.312 and second-order autocorrelation AR(2) p-value of 0.204. Policy implications suggest that regulatory incentives and capacity-building can enhance green banking adoption, contributing to sustainable finance.
Green BankingIndian BanksSustainabilityRenewable Energy FinanceEnvironmental Risk